It's not wise to make it such a big deal. They want to point out that fact that as a person part of the HK S.A.R., they should have access to Macau S.A.R. or even mainland China. If that is the case, then shouldn't all Chinese citizens have access to Hong Kong and Macau as well?
They never point out the fact that who's interest they represent. After being a British colony for a century and a half, one can't really be classified as Chinese just by having the ID card.
From Macau's point of view, I see you people coming here having potential risk of starting violent demostrations (we have seen it enough in 立法会). Then for security reasons, I can really reject your entry. It's not that big of a deal.
I just refuse to believe all democrats from HK is banned from Macau.
I agree with their point of view that the black list includes too many innocent people. Why this incidence is a hot topic and widely discussed? It is because a professor who is not a member of democratic party is rejected from accessing Macau. He was going there to attend an academic conference or seminar only, why was he rejected?
3 則留言:
It's not wise to make it such a big deal. They want to point out that fact that as a person part of the HK S.A.R., they should have access to Macau S.A.R. or even mainland China. If that is the case, then shouldn't all Chinese citizens have access to Hong Kong and Macau as well?
They never point out the fact that who's interest they represent. After being a British colony for a century and a half, one can't really be classified as Chinese just by having the ID card.
From Macau's point of view, I see you people coming here having potential risk of starting violent demostrations (we have seen it enough in 立法会). Then for security reasons, I can really reject your entry. It's not that big of a deal.
I just refuse to believe all democrats from HK is banned from Macau.
I agree with their point of view that the black list includes too many innocent people. Why this incidence is a hot topic and widely discussed? It is because a professor who is not a member of democratic party is rejected from accessing Macau. He was going there to attend an academic conference or seminar only, why was he rejected?
唯一可以拉上關係的，就是當年他有份搞反釋法遊行、反廿三條及關注四十五條吧....在北京眼中，這個已經是搞顛覆了!!
張貼留言