2009年2月7日 星期六

C + Case Study


週四晚,LKF酒吧內,Networking Happy Hour.

Invitation 上寫著聚會由七點半開始,一直以守時自傲的你跟友人準時到達.眼見場內得小貓十餘隻,你倆到吧檯拿過一瓶啤酒後,很自然地走到一個不太惹人注目,但又可以望到門口的位置.

三十分鐘過去,你跟友人依然站在同一角落,有一句沒一句的閒扯著,但目光卻不時盯著門口.誰進來誰離開,你不單心中有數,更暗自在心裡打上剔或交叉.

然後,一名剛進場的異性不經意地望向你,四目交投,你立即把頭轉向另外一邊,向他/她展示 "拿,你唔好意為我特登(目及)你啊!"的姿態.

你努力的把頭保持在那一個"避免誤會的角度",唔,大概有分半鐘左右吧,你眼尾睄到她已經行開,才敢把頭放回一個正常的角度.

呢個時候,你開始有一絲懷疑: "其實,頭先果個,都好似得得地架窩"....

想再望多兩眼,但已經太遲了.諗多兩諗,你終於打破 Dead Air 七分鐘的悶局,開口問友人

"喂,頭先入黎時望住我果個男(女)仔,你覺得O唔OK啊?"
"邊個呀?”
"呢,著黑色衫果個呢"

友人將目光從左到右一掃,企圖從在場的六七十人當中,找出你所說的目標人物.奈何穿黑色衫的人實在太多,他只能滿臉茫然地回你一個 "下!?!?!?".

失望之下,你開始在黑陌陌的酒吧內,依靠微弱燈光,嘗試以眼睛找回他/她所穿的那件黑衫.

手上那瓶啤酒越來越暖,而你的一雙腿也開始酸了.但心內又有一絲不忿,因為你未能證實他/她的質素如何.死死地氣走到吧頭,買來另一支冰凍啤酒,又自然地走回那個安全的角落,企在友人身旁,繼續你的搜索行動.

這一次,你只拿著啤酒站了二十分鐘,友人便提議離開.你心裡暗嘆 "唉,今晚都係無運行架喇,都係收隊罷啦."

一個月後,朋友再叫你去同類型聚會,你已經無乜興趣再參與.

因為你覺得,早d返屋企打機/訓覺/上網好過.

* * *
我的回应:
1) Invitation 雖然說聚會是七點半, 但大部分去LKF的人都會九點才出席, 所以應該與朋友吃飽晚飯, 才出席聚會, 以免站得過久又悶又累.
2) 如果遲些才進場, 就應該會比較多人在場內, 那麼就不需要只盯著門口看了. 可以在場內慢慢看, 與朋友談論場內的燕瘦環肥, 也多點談資.
3) 萬一與別人四目交頭了, 不必急需去判斷對方的儀容外表身高職業, 大大方方作個笑容給對方, 是不會死人的.
4) 不必徵求朋友的意見, 只要自己覺得合眼緣即可.
5) 場內有眾多俊男美女, 走失了一個, 還有許多其他的選擇. 不必為一棵連樣子都看不清楚的樹, 放棄整座森林.

2009年2月6日 星期五

晕其大浪

有一段日子没有见过T君, 他仍然俊朗如昔. 今天与他吃晚饭, 总是感觉怪怪的. 原来他的恤杉与Tie非常不搭配, 怪不得正面看他, 有晕旋的感觉.

家常话



昨日在家吃晚饭, 客厅的大电视播放着NOW体育节目, 饭桌(按1)的电脑正在播放高清节目:

小瓶子: 「知否我们家为什么如此和谐?」

父:
「为什么?」

小瓶子: 「因为我们绝对不需要争电视用, 母亲可以用饭桌的电脑看高清节目, 而你可以24小时看NOW体育台. 我, 吃完饭就可以马上回房间用我的电脑上PPS看喜欢的剧集.」

母: (非常专心地看她的电视剧)
「...............」

父:
「一家人最重要互相礼让, 怎会为了一部电视机吵架呢?」

小瓶子: 「有些家庭为了争厠所而兵相见哦. 早前不是有丈夫因为与妻子厠所而错手杀死妻子吗?

母:
(仍然非常专心看她的电视剧)「哦, 弊啦, 这是个特务.......」

父:
「怎可能呢? 做人应该....(下删15分钟道德课)」

母: (仍然沉醉在她的电视剧)「...............」

小瓶子:
「整天都看体育, 很闷吖, 转台得唔得吖?

父: 「现在没有什么节目好看哦, 体育好啊, 你看跳水多好看.」

小瓶子: (马上三扒两拨吃完晚饭, 回房间开电脑)「..............」

按1: 我家饭桌的前身是会议室的桌子, 由家父从某商业大厦拾回来的. 因为桌子够大, 所以一边放电脑, 另一边开餐绝无问题.

2009年2月5日 星期四

消遣书

今日去Citysuper, 结果买不着想买的东西, 却走进了隔离的 Page One. 自从习惯了看简体字之后, 我已经很少在香港买繁体书, 因为工幹顺道在深圳买书便宜许多. 不过, 这两本书相信没有简体版吧, 而且可以想象简体版的《我们的低能婚礼》可能低能程度减低, 反而不够传神了.

另外一本
那简直不能叫做爱》是一位我很喜欢的台湾blogger 写的. 她的Blog 我经常都会看, 所以对于她写的书也出钱捧场.

Facebook

以前觉得facebook 的版面不好用, 所以虽然开了A/C, 但甚少 login. 但最近发现朋友们都从 facebook 里面得知其他人的资讯, 有些话题都是围绕着facebook 的近照, 再不用 facebook, 会与现实生活中的朋友们脱节. 因此, 开始用 facebook 了.

潮流的大势, 很难抗拒.

網上求簽

见到有人求簽, 我自己都玩埋一份. 似乎是好簽来的哦.

2009年2月4日 星期三

挑战新高度



3.5寸高跟鞋: HK$ 159

与鞋匠的对话


买了新高跟鞋, 交给鞋匠加防滑垫. 年青的鞋匠熟练地处理他的工作, 口也没有闲下, 与我攀谈起来.

鞋匠: 「靓女 (对一至八十岁的女人都合适的称呼), 新年去边度玩吖?」
小瓶子:
「无哦, 留港消费吖嘛! 你呢?」
鞋匠: 「去左澳门几日, 嗰度好有新年气氛.」
小瓶子: 澳门有乜特别野玩吖?
鞋匠: 「烧炮仗, 放烟花, 香港都无得玩呢D 0野啦.」

接着聊了一些别的东西.
鞋匠见到我用陈大文推介的爽健鞋垫. 开始了另一话题.

鞋匠: 「呢隻鞋垫好用吖, 你识买哦.」
小瓶子: 朋友介绍的嘛.
鞋匠: 「不过你买嗰码太细啦, 可以买大D 然后自己 cut 番细佢, 最重要系要配合鞋型, 完全fit 晒无空位就最舒服, 呢嗰鞋垫唔怕买多几个.」
小瓶子: 哦, 买大一个码我唔识剪.」
鞋匠: (示范如何剪)得啦, 你唔识剪我请你吃饭教你剪.
小瓶子: (flirting 的经验不足, 不知道如何应对)「.............
鞋匠: 不过我请你食饭, 你请我檸檬0架啦, 哈哈.

接着, 叉开了话题, 讲了如何保养皮鞋的知识. 临走前,
鞋匠作出最后一击.
鞋匠: 记得囖齐野啦, 啊, 唔系, 你囖漏野等我追你九跳街先.
小瓶子: (仍然因为flirting 的经验不足, 不知道如何应对)「........
鞋匠: 多谢光临, 下次再来啦.
小瓶子:
「唔该晒啦, bye bye.」

2009年2月3日 星期二

生日快乐

我的生日快到了, 朋友们将会帮我庆祝. 一句「 生日快乐」 让我想起电影生日快乐. 当年失恋, 走去电影院看了这套电影, 便出事了. 眼泪完全不受控制地流出来, 这是我有生以来第一次在电影院里哭. 以前《铁达尼》听到别人哭, 反而会想笑, 但那次, 是完全沉醉于电影的悲伤.

直到现在, 伤口虽然开始结枷, 但我还是没有勇气再看一次生日快乐》, 也不想别人对我说「 生日快乐」.


我们说好的



生日快樂

为什么别离了两年多, 从我的生命里彻底消失的你, 要偷偷爬入我的梦境, 折磨我的心?

2009年2月2日 星期一

叶问


每次看完电影都会马上在BLOG记下自己的观感. 这套《叶问》是早几天看的了, 但一直都想不到究竟写些什么好, 所以搁了下来.

这套电影比《崖上的波儿》及《梅蘭芳》好看. 相信甄子丹演《叶问》几乎算是最佳人选了. 他有武学根底, 而且做戏时表情不多, 反而更有一种中国男子传统内敛的气质. 故事方面, 可能是人物传记吧, 剧情很公式化, 没有惊喜.

早前听说梁朝伟也演 《叶问》, 我非常喜欢梁朝伟, 觉得很多角色交到他手, 都会有突破. 期待那套《叶问》的出炉, 让我看后可作比较.

Bitch and the City


4 bitches dine out. A very funny comment written by Ms Bing, the prettiest bitch, is as follows:

B etty
B ingbing
H ilda

All can be found in BITCH... How about G???
G ood Bitch?


悠长假期后


放完长假后, 并没有龙精虎猛或者容光焕发. 早上天还未亮就起床, 想起回到公司积累了多少Email/文件, 想想又要等多长时间才能再放长假, 心情便会直插谷底.

唯一的安慰是, 今天可以回公司逗利是, 无论上司下属, 都会派给我. 究竟是几多岁才没有利是逗呢? 或者只要是单身, 就一直可以逗下去呢? 那么单身还是有单身的好处.

2009年2月1日 星期日

乱伦


不知道韩国是否特别多孤儿, 而又很多人会领养孤儿. 有好几套的韩剧都有一个共同的桥段, 讲述自小领回来的养子/养儿, 长大后爱上了自家的孩子. 当事人其实没有血缘关系, 但这种爱却被视为兄妹乱伦, 不被父母亲人朋友所接受.

但在我看来, 其实没有血缘关系的兄妹/姐弟, 就不能算是乱伦. 他们的感情是自小培养, 非常深厚, 结合后不容易分开. 那么这些婚姻又有什么坏处? 只要向亲友解释清楚当初领养关系即可. 所以看到剧中那些角色, 为了这些事哭到死去活来, 觉得难以理解.

妻子的誘惑

看韩剧真的是少点耐性和坚持都会抓狂. 这套剧全长竟然有 120集, 现在才出了一半. 究竟编剧是如何对荒谬的剧情自圆其说呢? 片中的富家子, 与妻子的好朋友一起背叛原配, 逼她离婚/堕胎/拖她入海, 差点就被淹死了.

女主角侥幸不死, 借用别人的身份, 重新回到前夫身边, 令曾经背叛她的人, 失去所有.

说真的, 丈夫杀死了自己的妻子, 后来见到一位与妻子一模一样的女人, 照理无论变得如何性感美丽, 也应该只会感到恐惧, 怎可能会对她产生兴趣, 被她吸引了呢?

这套片忠奸角色分明, 坏旦们心如蛇蠍, 虽然结局如何尚未知道, 不过一定是下场悲惨.

生日派对


今日朋友在 cafe 搞了一个生日派对, 邀请了差不多30 人上 cafe. 趁此机会, 见到一些10年未见的中学同学.

旧朋友谈起以前读书趣事, 班主任等等, 可惜我是出了名的少年痴呆, 只勉强记得同学们的样子, 名子许多不记得了, 班主任是谁更加想不起来. 大概我以前中学的生活是梦游中度过吧!

即便如此, 从遇旧同学也是一件值得快乐的一件事.

2009年1月30日 星期五

全球投訴《崖上的波兒》大行動


前几天看《 崖上的波儿》, 提到 「这套片讲人和鱼相爱, 会否变成煽动或鼓吹或提倡人兽交合法化思想的武器吖? 盲光社/某些宗教团体可要注意了.」岂料, 相关的宗教团体果然「做野了」,在 facebook 搞了一個反擊大行動,計劃叫做「全球投訴《崖上的波兒》大行動」

轉載內容:
本人乃是「浪子回頭」的基督徒,自幼隨家人返教會,近二十年,但後來受不了魔鬼的誘惑,離開了教會,離開了耶穌基督,過著沉淪的罪人生活,如今已「覺今時而 昨非」重新歸向主之懷抱。我們基督徒抱的是一顆耶穌基督的心,「願萬民得救,不願一人沈淪」。我曾經沈淪過,所以我知到耶穌基督乃是惟一的道路,若不是藉 著主基督,沒有人能到父的天堂去。所以聖經乃是世上惟一的真理。有見近日社會上的色情資訊氾濫,侮淫侮盜,不單為了滿足成人荒淫,更要荼毒我們單純的下一 代,我實在看不過眼。

近日上映的合家歡賀年電影《崖上的波兒》(下簡稱:崖波),實在是近期「教壞細路」的代表作:
1. 《崖波》片名意淫,當一位女士站立的時候,其腹無疑就如一幅山崖,而崖上的波兒,明顯意有所指,其心可誅。
2. 《崖波》片中,說及一個五歲的小孩愛上一條魚,片中主角宗介更大膽言明:「不管波兒是魚還是半人魚…都喜歡他」,這明確地是有意鼓吹人獸交。
3. 如果《崖波》能是「第一類別」的電影,無疑是間接認同人獸交,如果認同了人獸交,就是主張有性無類,那麼就等於認同同性性交,認同了同性性交就等於鼓吹同 性戀,鼓吹同性戀也就讓同性戀無止境擴張,那麼人類就會絕種。聖經上清楚記載所多瑪城滅亡的故事,如果讓《崖波》成為「第一類別」電影,誓必引致地球大爆 炸。
4. 教會經常接到貓、狗、金魚、螞蟻等等的救助,表示曾受不同程度的性騷擾,如遭主人強迫觀看其自瀆。因此我們經常要提供心理輔導,如果讓《崖波》在香港上映,實在會大大增加我們前線工作人員的負擔,火頭愈多,我們救火的人便愈辛苦,乞求大家不要再放火。

人 獸交在任何地方都是不可接受的,更是違反香港法律,《崖波》實在比「四仔」有過之而無不及,不單不應是合家歡電影,更是不應讓其流通。我們知道所有情慾的 罪都是由眼目而來,故此政府應大力監管資訊的流通,建議回復文革時代的樣板戲,維護我們香港的核心價值,基督教不可踰越的道德標準。

關心香港幸福
特別是我們下面果代的
老虔基督徒 谷精上腦謹啟

2009年1月29日 星期四

圣经故事 = 性经故事



伸延阅读:
http://truthbible.net/

赤口饭局

年初三赤口, 四位命硬而又不相剋的女子约出来吃饭. L 小姐大谈「她的肥胖之道」, 但你可要知道, 即使你肥了十磅, 还是穿加细码的衣服哦. 如果太瘦, 岂非没有衣服可穿? 音乐家 H 小姐刚刚从欧洲回来, 由于旅行途中病了, 所以没有心情搞艳遇. G 小姐原本害怕这天约人会令朋友反目成仇, 因为她曾有此经验, 邪到极点. 可是这次我们的「神秘乐观」技术击倒了她的信仰, 没有人发神经地反檯 (虽然爆粗是少不免), 也没有因为遇上靓仔, 为争仔而大打出手.

我们去了一间日本餐厅吃晚饭. 由于我戒口的关系, 没有吃寿司. 我叫了一个饭, 一个菜及一锅豆腐. 我觉得这个豆腐蛮不错的, 比我想象中好吃.


大家酒过三巡 (其实是以茶代酒), 开始忘形的谈起3P4P5P. 本来服务员正在为我们倒茶, 可被我们的一番言论吓倒, 茶还未倒完就急急脚走了.

新年的最后一天假期, 便在饮饱食醉的情况下, 开开心心的结束了.

2009年1月28日 星期三

天水围的日与夜


这套片的生活蛮像我以前的生活啊! (其实和现在的生活也分别不大.) 张家安的家太大了, 不应该有自己的房哦, 以前我一家三口住的公屋都是没房间的. 政府才不会分配这么大间屋给穷人呢!

这片中的青年张家安回应父母唠叨的风格跟我太相似了:
父母: 「穿多点衣服!」
小瓶子:「得喇! (喇字的尾音稍微向上)」 (仍然穿着原本那件衣服出门)
父母: 「早点睡啦!」
小瓶子:「得喇! 」(仍然没有上床睡觉的意思)
父母: 「现在不睡, 明天没有精神上学/上班」
小瓶子:「得喇! 」(眼珠仍然盯着书/电脑不动)
父母: 「今晚早点回家哦.」
小瓶子:「得喇! 」(仍然是晚上十二点多才回家)

灰姑娘


昨天晚上与朋友们去唱K. 差不多到12点的时候, 看看手提电话. 依? 没有 miss call, 非常不对劲. 平常父母的「夺命追魂」 call 应该是差不多十点多十一点杀到, miss 了一个会有第二个第三个接着来, 今天为何如此反常? 所谓反常即为妖, 不会家中有些什么事吧. 由于无事的话父母已经一早睡了, 所以我没有打电话. 而且打电话去问父母「为什么你不打电话给我?」这不是自招麻烦吗? 结果, 我赶在十二点前, 离开了K 房, 回家去了.

幸好, 家中无事. 父亲一向「醒訓」, 还说睡到像死猪般, 外面发生什么事情都不知道是不行的. 所以每次迟归, 一开门他便醒了. 一定要听到我的声音, 确定进来的是我, 才能安心睡去.

崖上的波儿





与朋友们一起去看《崖上的波儿》, 观点如下:
1. 波儿的妹妹是一大队红色人头鱼身的「金鱼」, 集体游来游去, 好恐怖吖, 这是恐怖片来吗?

2. 这套片讲人和鱼相爱, 会否变成煽动或鼓吹或提倡人兽交合法化思想的武器吖? 盲光社/某些宗教团体可要注意了.

3. 为什么片中的男主角, 五岁的宗介会直呼他父母亲的名字, 而不喊「爸爸」/「妈妈」? (我们看广东话版) 小朋友看完, 没大没小的跟着学, 怎么办?

4. 五岁的宗介和波儿私定终身, 如果将来宗介不爱波儿的话, 波儿就会变成水泡. 朋友的见解是: 「99.9% 变成水泡啦!」想想又真的是, 「波儿」这个名字, 不就是象征着「泡」吗? 改名的一刻就已经揭露了她的命运.

5. 五岁就可以谈恋爱, 这是否因应现在的潮流趋势, 索性鼓励孩子们早熟点? 「终身承诺, 由五岁开始」将会是一个不错的口号.

6. 在香港养一个小朋友要四百万, 现在宗介父母平白多了一个童养媳, 岂不是要八百万? 幸好, 这个故事背景是在日本.

2009年1月27日 星期二

长发? 短发?


大美人留了一辈子长发, 又负离子拉直又游离子电发, 转了数次发型后闷得发慌, 不停问朋友: 我剪短头发好唔好吖?」

事实上, 大美人就算剃光头, 都是一个美人胚子. 就例如, 武则天去了感业寺做尼姑, 还不是把唐高宗勾引得三魂不见了七
魄吗?

我对于她
剪短她头发的意见是: 唔系甘好睇咯!」即是现在大美人的容貌外表是100分, 剃光头是90分, 那么剪短发则是95分.

大美人, 你愿意放弃手上那5分, 令你与我这些只有10分的女人距离拉近吗? 若果是, 也算是功德一件.

落叶归根


年初二百无禁忌, 所以看了一套长辈知道定必会说「睬!睬! 睬!, 新年流流看死人戏!

开初认为主角趙本山坚持送老朋友的遗体回家乡, 是太固执. 遗体发臭了怎办? 传染开病毒怎办? 但随着故事 发展, 却开始欣赏起趙本山来. 他千辛万苦, 所有钱都没了, 有上餐没下餐的, 背着一条干尸, 走几千里路, 就是为了一句对朋友的的承诺.

趙本山这一路上, 遇到各式各样的人, 有好人, 有坏旦. 后来他遇上了意中人 - 一位以拾荒及卖血供儿子上大学念书的寡妇. 那位寡妇说儿子后来不愿意见她, 叫她寄钱就行了, 这段说话令我心酸落泪. (大吉利是!) 幸而, 他们俩马上好上了, 把这悲哀冲淡了许多.

这套片笑中有泪, 苦乐掺半. 看趙本山走这一条落叶归根的路, 就好像人生道路的缩影.

题外话, 开始看这套片的时候, 我没看字幕. 但后来发现不看字幕, 没法听清楚演员的对白. 看来我的普通话只够应付梅蘭芳》此类电影, 有点乡音的变调就不敷应用了.

2009年1月26日 星期一

Talking to God


I met god the other day.
I know what you’re thinking. How the hell did you know it was god?
Well, I’ll explain as we go along, but basically he convinced me by having all, and I do mean ALL, the answers. Every question I flung at him he batted back with a plausible and satisfactory answer. In the end, it was easier to accept that he was god than otherwise.
Which is odd, because I’m still an atheist and we even agree on that!
It all started on the 8.20 back from Paddington. Got myself a nice window seat, no screaming brats or drunken hooligans within earshot. Not even a mobile phone in sight. Sat down, reading the paper and in he walks.
What did he look like?
Well not what you might have expected that’s for sure. He was about 30, wearing a pair of jeans and a "hobgoblin" tee shirt. Definitely casual. Looked like he could have been a social worker or perhaps a programmer like myself.
‘Anyone sitting here?’ he said.
‘Help yourself’ I replied.
Sits down, relaxes, I ignore and back to the correspondence on genetic foods entering the food chain…
Train pulls out and a few minutes later he speaks.
‘Can I ask you a question?’
Fighting to restrain my left eyebrow I replied ‘Yes’ in a tone which was intended to convey that I might not mind one question, and possibly a supplementary, but I really wasn’t in the mood for a conversation. ..
‘Why don’t you believe in god?’
The Bastard!
I love this kind of conversation and can rabbit on for hours about the nonsense of theist beliefs. But I have to be in the mood! Its like when a jehova’s witness knocks on your door 20 minutes before you’re due to have a wisdom tooth pulled. Much as you'd really love to stay… You can’t even begin the fun. And I knew, if I gave my standard reply we’d still be arguing when we got to Cardiff. I just wasn’t in the mood. I needed to fend him off.
But then I thought ‘Odd! How is this perfect stranger so obviously confident – and correct – about my atheism?’ If I’d been driving my car, it wouldn’t have been such a mystery. I’ve got the Darwin fish on the back of mine – the antidote to that twee christian fish you see all over. So anyone spotting that and understanding it would have been in a position to guess my beliefs. But I was on a train and not even wearing my Darwin "Evolve" tshirt that day. And ‘The Independent’ isn’t a registered flag for card carrying atheists, so what, I wondered, had given the game away.
‘What makes you so certain that I don’t?’
‘Because’, he said, ‘ I am god – and you are not afraid of me’
You’ll have to take my word for it of course, but there are ways you can deliver a line like that – most of which would render the speaker a candidate for an institution, or at least prozac. Some of which could be construed as mildly amusing.
Conveying it as "indifferent fact" is a difficult task but that’s exactly how it came across. Nothing in his tone or attitude struck me as even mildly out of place with that statement. He said it because he believed it and his rationality did not appear to be drug induced or the result of a mental breakdown.
‘And why should I believe that?’
‘Well’ he said, ‘why don’t you ask me a few questions. Anything you like, and see if the answers satisfy your sceptical mind?’
This is going to be a short conversation after all, I thought.
‘Who am I?’
‘Stottle. Harry Stottle, born August 10 1947, Bristol, England. Father Paul, Mother Mary. Educated Duke of Yorks Royal Military School 1960 67, Sandhurst and Oxford, PhD in Exobiology, failed rock singer, full time trade union activist for 10 years, latterly self employed computer programmer, web author and aspiring philosopher. Married to Michelle, American citizen, two children by a previous marriage. You’re returning home after what seems to have been a successful meeting with an investor interested in your proposed product tracking anti-forgery software and protocol and you ate a full english breakfast at the hotel this morning except that, as usual, you asked them to hold the revolting english sausages and give you some extra bacon. ‘
He paused
‘You’re not convinced. Hmmm… what would it take to convince you?’
'oh right! Your most secret password and its association'
A serious hacker might be able to obtain the password, but no one else and I mean
NO ONE
knows its association.
He did.
So how would you have played it?
I threw a few more questions about relatively insignificant but unpublicised details of my life (like what my mother claims was the first word I ever spoke – apparently "armadillo"! (Don't ask…)) but I was already pretty convinced. I knew there were only three possible explanations at this point.
Possibility One was that I was dreaming or hallucinating. Nobody’s figured out a test for that so, at the time I think that was my dominant feeling. It did not feel real at the time. More like I was in a play. Acting my lines. Since the event, however, continuing detailed memories of it, together with my contemporaneous notes, remain available, so unless the hallucination has continued to this day, I am now inclined to reject the hallucination hypothesis. Which leaves two others.
He could have been a true telepath. No documented evidence exists of anyone ever having such profound abilities to date but it was a possibility. It would have explained how he could know my best-kept secrets. The problem with that is that it doesn’t explain anything else! In particular it doesn’t account for the answers he proceeded to give to my later questions.
As Sherlock Holmes says, when you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Good empiricist, Sherlock.
I was forced to accept at least the possibility that this man was who he claimed to be.
So now what do you do?
Well, I’ve always known that if I met god I would have a million questions for him, so I thought, ‘why not?’ and proceeded with what follows. You’ll have to allow a bit of licence in the detail of the conversation. This was, shall we say, a somewhat unusual occurrence, not to mention just a BIT weird! And yes I was a leetle bit nervous! So if I don’t get it word perfect don’t whinge! You’ll get the gist I promise.***********************************

‘Forgive me if it takes me a little time to get up to speed here, but its not everyday I get to question a deity’
‘The Deity’ he interrupted.
‘ooh. Touchy!’ I thought.
‘Not really – just correcting the image’
Now That takes some getting used to!
I tried to get a grip on my thoughts, with an internal command - ‘Discipline Harry. You’ve always wanted to be in a situation like this, now you’re actually in it, you mustn’t go to pieces and waste the opportunity of a lifetime’
‘You won’t’ he said.
Tell you! That’s the bit that made it feel unreal more than anything else - this guy sitting across the table and very obviously accurately reading my every thought. Its like finding someone else hand inside your trouser pocket!
Nevertheless, something made me inclined to accept the invasion, I had obviously begun to have some confidence in his perception or abilities, so I distinctly remember the effect of his words was that I suddenly felt deeply reassured and completely relaxed. As he had no doubt intended. Man must have an amazing seduction technique!
So then we got down to business…
‘Are you human?’
‘No’
‘Were you, ever?’
‘No, but similar, Yes’
‘Ah, so you are a product of evolution?’
‘Most certainly – mainly my own’
‘and you evolved from a species like ours, dna based organisms or something equally viable?’
‘Correct’
‘so what, exactly, makes you god?’
‘I did’
‘Why?’
‘Seemed like a good idea at the time’
‘and your present powers, are they in any way similar to what the superstitious believers in my species attribute to you?’
‘Close enough. ’
‘So you created all this, just for us?’
‘No. Of course not’
‘But you did create the Universe?’

‘This One. Yes’
‘But not your own?’
‘This is my own!’
‘You know what I mean!’
‘You can’t create your own parents, so No’
‘So let me get this straight. You are an entirely natural phenomenon.’
‘Entirely’
‘Arising from mechanisms which we ourselves will one day understand and possibly even master?’
‘subject to a quibble over who "we ourselves" may be, but yes’
‘meaning that if the human race doesn’t come up to the mark, other species eventually will?’
‘in one.’
‘and how many other species are there already out there ahead of us?’
‘surprisingly few. Less than fourteen million’
‘FEW!?’
‘Phew!’
‘And how many at or about our level?’
‘currently a little over 4 ½ billion’
‘so our significance in the universe at present is roughly equivalent to the significance of the average Joe here on planet Earth in his relation to the human race?’
‘a little less. Level One, the level your species has reached, begins with the invention of the flying machine. I define the next level in terms your Sci Fi Author Isaac Asimov has already grasped. It is reached when you achieve control of your own primary – the Sun. What Asimov calls a Type I technology. Humanity is only just into the flying machine phase, so as you can imagine, on that scale, the human race is somewhat near the bottom of the level one pack’
‘and all these species are your children?’
‘I like to think of them that way’
‘and the point?’
‘at its simplest, "Life Must Go On". My personal motivation is the desire for conversation. Once you’ve achieved my level, you cease to be billions of separate entities and become one ecstatic whole. A single entity that cannot die, however advanced, or perhaps, more accurately, because it is so advanced, will get lonely and even a trifle bored! I seem to be the first. I do not intend to be the last’
‘so you created a Universe which is potentially capable of producing another god like yourself?’
‘The full benefit will be temporary, but like most orgasms, worth it.’
‘this being the moment when our new god merges with you and we become one again?’
‘don’t play it down, that’s the ecstatic vision driving us all, me included – and when it happens the ecstasy lasts several times longer than this universe has already existed. Believe me, it really is worth the effort.’
‘Yes, I think I can see the attractions of a hundred billion year long orgasm’
‘and humans haven’t even begun to know how to really enjoy the orgasms they are already capable of. Wait till you master that simple art!’
‘So its all about sex is it?’
‘Ecstasy is merely a reward for procreating, it is what makes you want to do it. This is necessary, initially, to promote biological evolution. However once you’ve completed that stage and no longer require procreation, you will learn that ecstasy can be infinitely more intense than anything offered by sex’
‘Sounds good to me!'
'How direct is your involvement in all this? Did you just light the fuse which set off the big bang and stand back and watch? Or did you have to plant the seeds on appropriately fertile planets?’
‘The seeds evolved in deep space, purely as a result of the operations of the laws of physics and chemistry which your scientists have begun to attain a reasonable grasp of. Yes I triggered the bang and essentially became dormant for nearly 5 billion years. That’s how long it took the first lifeforms to emerge. That places them some 8 billion years ahead of you. The first intelligent species are now 4.3 billion years ahead of you. Really quite advanced. I can have deeply meaningful conversations with them. And usually do. In fact I am as we speak’
‘So then what?’
‘Do I keep a constant vigil over every move you make? Not in the kind of prying intrusive sense that some of you seem to think. Let's say I maintain an awareness of what's going on, at a planetary level. I tend only to focus on evolutionary leaps. See if they’re going in the right direction’
‘And if they’re not?’
‘Nothing. Usually’
‘Usually?’
‘Usually species evolving in the wrong direction kill themselves off or become extinct for other reasons’
‘Usually?’
‘There have been one or two cases where a wrong species has had the potential of becoming dominant at the expense of a more promising strain’
‘Let me guess. Dinosaurs on this planet are an example. Too successful. Suppressed the development of mammals and were showing no signs of developing intelligence. So you engineered a little corrective action in the form of a suitably selected asteroid’
‘Perceptive. Almost correct. They were showing signs of developing intelligence, even co-operation. Study your velocirapters. But far too predatory. Incapable of ever developing a "respect" for other life forms. It takes carrying your young to promote the development of emotional attachment to other animals. Earth reptiles aren’t built for that. The mammals who are, as you rightly say, couldn’t get a foothold against such mighty predators. You’ve now reached the stage where you could hold your own even against dinosaurs, but that’s only been true for about a thousand years, you wouldn’t have stood a chance 2 million years ago, so the dinosaurs had to go. They were, however, far too well balanced with the ecology of the planet, and never developed technology, so they weren’t going to kill themselves off in a hurry. Regrettably, I had to intervene.’
‘Regrettably?’
‘They were a beautiful and stunningly successful life form. One doesn’t destroy such things without a qualm.’
‘But at that stage how could you know that a better prospect would arise from the ashes?’
‘I didn’t. But the probability was quite high.’
‘and since then, what other little tweaks have you been responsible for in our development?’
‘None whatsoever. I set an alarm for the first sign of aerial activity, as I usually do. Leonardo looked promising for a while, but not until the Montgolfier brothers did I really begin to take an interest. That registered you as a level one intelligent species’
‘So Jesus of Nazareth, Moses, Mohammed…’
‘hmmm… sadly misguided I’m afraid. Anyone capable of communicating with their own cells will dimly perceive me – and all other life as being connected in a strictly quantum sense, but interpreting that vision as representing something supernatural and requiring obeisance is somewhat wide of the mark. And their followers are all a bit too obsessive and religious for my liking. Its no fun being worshipped once you stop being an adolescent teenager. Having said that, it's not at all unusual for developing species to go through that phase. Until they begin to grasp how much they too can shape their small corner of the universe, they are in understandable awe of an individual dimly but correctly perceived to be responsible for the creation of the whole of that universe. Eventually, if they are to have any hope of attaining level two, they must grow out of it and begin to accept their own power and potential. Its very akin to a child’s relationship with its parents. The awe and worship must disappear before the child can become an adult. Respect is not so bad as long as its not overdone. And I certainly respect all those species who make it that far. It’s a hard slog. I know. I've been there.’
‘You’ve been watching us since the Montgolfiers, when was that? 1650s?’
‘Close. 1783’
‘Well, if you’ve been watching us closely since then, what your average citizen is going to want to know is why you haven’t intervened more often. Why, if you have that sort of power, did you allow such incredible suffering and human misery?’
‘It seems to be necessary.’
‘NECESSARY??!!’
‘Without exception, intelligent species who gain dominance over their planet do so by becoming the most efficient predators. There are many intelligent species who do not evolve to dominate their planet. Like your dolphins, they adapt perfectly to the environment rather than take your course, which is to manipulate the environment. Unfortunately for the dolphin, his is a dead end. He may outlive the human race but will never escape the bounds of planet earth - not without your help at any rate. Only those who can manipulate the world they live in can one day hope to leave it and spread their seed throughout the universe.
Unlike the adaptors, who learn the point of cooperation fairly early on, manipulators battle on. And, once all lesser species have been overcome, they are so competitive and predatory that they are compelled to turn in on themselves. This nearly always evolves into tribal competition in one form or another and becomes more and more destructive - exactly like your own history. However this competition is vital to promote the leap from biological to technological evolution.
You need an arms race in order to make progress.
Your desire to dominate fuels a search for knowledge which the adaptors never require. And although your initial desire for knowledge is selfish and destructive, it begins the development of an intellectual self awareness, a form of higher consciousness, which never emerges in any other species. Not even while they are experiencing it, for example, can the intelligent adaptors - your dolphins - express the concepts of Love or Time.
Militarisation and the development of weapons of mass destruction are your first serious test at level one. You're still not through that phase, though the signs are promising. There is no point whatsoever in my intervening to prevent your self-destruction. Your ability to survive these urges is a crucial test of your fitness to survive later stages. So I would not, never have and never will intervene to prevent a species from destroying itself. Most, in fact, do just that.’
‘And what of pity for those have to live through this torment?’
‘I can’t say this in any way that doesn’t sound callous, but how much time do you spend worrying about the ants you run over in your car? I know it sounds horrendous to you, but you have to see the bigger picture. At this stage in human development, you’re becoming interesting but not yet important.’
'ah but I can't have an intelligent conversation with an ant'
'precisely'
‘hmm… as you know, humans won’t like even to attempt to grasp that perspective. How can you make it more palatable?’
‘Why should I? You don’t appear to have any trouble grasping it. You’re by no means unique. And in any case, once they begin to understand what's in it for them, they’ll be somewhat less inclined to moan. Eternal life compensates for most things.’
‘So what are we supposed to do in order to qualify for membership of the universal intelligentsia?’
‘Evolve. Survive’
‘Yes, but how?’
‘Oh, I thought you might have got the point by now. "How" is entirely up to you. If I have to help, then you’re a failure. All I will say is this. You’ve already passed a major hurdle in learning to live with nuclear weapons. Its depressing how many fail at that stage.’
‘Is there worse to come?’
‘Much’
‘Genetic warfare for instance?
‘Distinct Possibility’
‘and the problem is… that we need to develop all these technologies, acquire all this dangerous knowledge in order to reach level two. But at any stage that knowledge could also cause our own destruction’
‘If you think the dangers of genetic warfare are serious, imagine discovering a secret thought or program, accessible to any intelligent individual, which, if abused, will eliminate your species instantly. If your progress continues as is, then you can expect to discover that particular self-destruct mechanism in less than a thousand years. Your species has got to grow up considerably before you can afford to make that discovery. And if you don’t make it, you will never leave your Solar System and join the rest of the sapient species on level two.’
’14 Million of them’
‘Just under’
'Will there be room for us?'
'it’s a big place'
‘and, for now, how should we mere mortals regard you then?’
‘like an older brother or sister. Of course I know more than you do. Of course I’m more powerful than you. I’ve been alive longer. But I’m not "better" than you. Just more developed. Just what you might become’
‘so we’re not obliged to "please" you or follow your alleged guidelines or anything like that?’
‘absolutely not. Never issued a single guideline in the lifetime of this Universe. Have to find your own way out of the maze. And one early improvement is to stop expecting me - or anyone else - to come and help you out.'
'I suppose that is a guideline of sorts, so there goes the habit of a lifetime! '
'Seriously though, species who hold on to religion past its sell-by date tend to be most likely to self destruct. They spend so much energy arguing about my true nature, and invest so much emotion in their wildly erroneous imagery that they end up killing each other over differences in definitions of something they clearly haven’t got a clue about. Ludicrous behaviour, but it does weed out the weaklings.’
‘Why me? Why pick on an atheist of all people? Why are you telling me all this? And why Now?’
‘Why You? Because can accept my existence without your ego caving in and grovelling like a naughty child. '
'Can you seriously imagine how the Pope would react to the reality of my existence?! If he really understood how badly wrong he and his church have been, how much of the pain and suffering you mentioned earlier has been caused by his religion, I suspect he'd have an instant coronary! Or can you picture what it would be like if I appeared "live" simultaneously on half a dozen tele-evangelist propaganda shows. Pat Robertson would wet himself if he actually understood who he was talking to.
Conversely, your interest is purely academic. You've never swallowed the fairy tale but you've remained open to the possibility of a more advanced life form which could acquire godlike powers. You’ve correctly guessed that godhood is the destiny of life. You have shown you can and do cope with the concept. It seemed reasonable to confirm your suspicions and let you do what you will with that information.
You can and will publish this conversation on the web, where it will sow an important seed. Might take a couple of hundred years to germinate, but, eventually, it will germinate.
Why Now? Well partly because both you and the web are ready now. But chiefly because the human race is reaching a critical phase. It goes back to what we were saying about the dangers of knowledge. Essentially your species is becoming aware of that danger. When that happens to any sapient species, the future can take three courses.
Many are tempted to avoid the danger by avoiding the knowledge. Like the adaptors, they are doomed to extinction. Often pleasantly enough in the confines of their own planet until either their will to live expires or their primary turns red giant and snuffs them out.
A large number go on blindly acquiring the knowledge and don't learn to restrain their abuse. Their fate is sealed somewhat more quickly of course, when Pandora’s box blows up in their faces.
The only ones who reach level two are those who learn to accept and to live with their most dangerous knowledge. Each and every individual in such a species must eventually become capable of destroying their entire species at any time. Yet they must learn to control themselves to the degree that they can survive even such deadly insight. And frankly, they’re the only ones we really want to see leaving their solar systems. Species that haven’t achieved that maturity could not be allowed to infect the rest of the universe, but fortunately that has never required my intervention. The knowledge always does the trick’
'Why can't there be a fourth option - selective research where we avoid investigating dangerous pathways?'
'As you can see from your own limited history, the most useful ideas are also, nearly always, the most dangerous. You have yet, for instance, to conquer fusion power but you need to do so in order to achieve appropriate energy surpluses required to complete this phase of your social development. It will, when you've mastered it, eliminate material inequalities and poverty within a generation or two, an absolutely vital step for any maturing species. Yet the discovery of the principles which will soon yield this beneficial bounty could, had you abused them, have ended your attempt at civilisation.
Similarly, you will shortly be able to conquer biological diseases and even engineer yourselves to be virtually fault free. Your biological life spans will double or treble within the next hundred years and your digital lifespans will become potentially infinite within the same period: If you survive the potential threat that the same technology provides in the form of genetic timebombs, custom built viruses and the other wonders of genetic and digital warfare.
You simply can't have the benefits without taking the risks'.
‘I’m not sure I understand my part in this exercise. I just publish this conversation on the web and everything will be alright?’
‘Not necessarily. Not that easy I’m afraid. To start with, who’s going to take this seriously? It will just be seen as a mildly amusing work of fiction. In fact, your words and indeed most of your work will not be understood or appreciated until some much more advanced scholars develop the ideas you are struggling to express and explain them somewhat more competently. At which point the ideas will be taken up en masse and searches will be undertaken of the archives. They will find this work and be struck by its prescience. You won’t make the Einstein grade, but you might manage John the Baptist!
This piece will have no significance whatsoever if humanity doesn’t make certain key advances in the next couple of centuries. And this won’t help you make those advances. What it will do is help you recognise them’
'can I ask what those advances may be?'
'I think you know. But yes - although you are at level one, there are several distinct phases which evolving species pass through on their way to level two. The first, as we've discussed, is the invention of the flying machine. The next significant phase is the development of the thinking machine.
At your present rate of progress, you are within a few decades of achieving that goal. It marks your first step on the path of technological evolution. Mapping the human genome is another classic landmark, but merely mapping it is a bit like viewing the compiled code in a dos executable. Its just meaningless gibberish, although with a bit of hacking here and there, you might correctly deduce the function of certain stretches of code.
What you really need to do is 'reverse engineer' the dna code. You have to figure out the grammar and syntax of the language. Then you will begin the task of designing yourselves. But that task requires the thinking machine'
‘You say you avoid intervention. But doesn’t this conversation itself constitute intervention – even if people alive now completely ignore it?’
‘Yes. But it's as far as I’m prepared to go. Its only effect is to confirm, if you find it, that you are on the right path. It is still entirely up to you to navigate the dangers on that path and beyond.’
'But why bother even with that much? Surely its just another evolutionary hurdle. We're either fit enough or not…'
'In many ways the transition to an information species is the most traumatic stage in evolution. Biological intelligences have a deeply rooted sense of consciousness only being conceivable from within an organic brain. Coming to terms with the realisation that you have created your successor, not just in the sense of mother and child, but in the collective sense of the species recognising it has become redundant, this paradigm shift is, for many species, a shift too far. They baulk at the challenge and run from this new knowledge. They fail and become extinct. Yet there is nothing fundamentally wrong with them - it is a failure of the imagination.
I hope that if I can get across the concept that I am a product of just such evolution, it may give them the confidence to try. I have discussed this with the level two species and the consensus is that this tiny prod is capable of increasing the contenders for level two without letting through any damaging traits. It has been tried in 312 cases. The jury is still out on its real benefits although it has produced a 12% increase in biological species embracing the transition to information species.
‘Alright, so what if everyone suddenly took it seriously and believed every word I write? Wouldn’t that constitute a somewhat more drastic intervention?’
‘Trust me. They wont’
'and so its still the case, that, should another asteroid happen to be heading our way, you will do nothing to impede it on our behalf?'
'I'm confident you will pass that test. And now my friend, the interview is over, you have asked me a number of the right questions, and I’ve said what I came to say, so I’ll be going now. It has been very nice to meet you - you're quite bright. For an ant!’ He twinkled.
‘Just one final, trivial question, why do you appear to me in the form of a thirty something white male?’
‘have I in any way intimidated or threatened you?’
‘No’
‘Do you find me sexually attractive?’
‘er No!’
‘So figure it out for yourself…’

----------------------------------------------------------------
Just finished reading this passage from someone's blog. The writer intends to spread out his conversation with God and hence I copy and paste it to my blog.

The feeling of reading this story is like watching "Matrix", interesting and enjoyable. If you ask whether I believe what the writer said? My answer is no. Purely because if I were him, I was not able to memorize the content of such long conversation in this level of details and then put it down into words.

However, I am pleased if what the writer said was true - Through evolution, human will one day attain the power and life form of God.

年初一

新年新希望, 小瓶子祝大家:


zwani.com myspace graphic comments

年三十

昨天与父母一起, 拿着一袋二袋的礼品上酒楼与亲友吃饭. 从背后看父母的背影, 他们将近七十了, 仍然那么壮健有力. 来年的愿望很简单, 一家人齐齐整整, 身体健康.

2009年1月25日 星期日

《逻辑思想上的謬誤》前言


我写《逻辑思想上的謬誤》这篇文章, 并非抱着我够醒我够型嘴瞄瞄寸寸贡黎横折曲乱up无谓的态度, 而是既然在《吵架》里面提到的一种思想謬誤解释得并不清楚, 那么不妨再用些篇幅去深入讨论.

而自问遣词用字已经非常小心, 尽量做到中性客观, 作出有逻辑的解释.

但如果有人认为这是无事生非, 多一事不如少一事, 真理越辩越混乱, 你有你逻辑我有我逻辑精神病人有精神病人逻辑, 套用陈大文的一句话「港式的和諧為本,體諒和包容,積極聽取各方面意見,殷切考慮平衡各方利益,在一個大家都接受的框架內作出微調,並經常作出檢討,以達致長遠對香港有利的方案,雲吞麵波羅包熱檸茶阿媽係女人等等」这种劝戒别人放弃理性思考的态度来看待逻辑上的謬誤, 我是恕不同意的.

逻辑思想上的謬誤


某些人对于我在吵架里所提到的一个自我推翻的思想謬誤, 不甚了解. 刚巧有位叫的blogger留言, 让我展示何谓思想上的自我推翻.

塔的留言如下:
我絕對認為每個人都是entitle有自己的意見 這是不容置疑的這些意見是屬於個人的難定對錯
但如何抒發那些意見 就是重點了
如果有blog主評論私人事 而我不認同 我不會在他blog留言說 你呀 這樣這樣是不對的 你呢 應該那樣那樣
我算老幾? 去指導人家該如何處理私人事
要指導人家 也要看自己在對方心中是否有份量 有資格去指導 否則徒然惹人笑話
你對家用、孝心的價值觀是為我所認同的
我不能認同的 是你指導空姐該省下買名牌/搬出去住的錢來付家用
另 每人都有自己的傷心事 難道因為世上有比我的經歷慘一千倍的人 我就不能為我的傷心事而傷心了嗎? 因為覺得別人不夠慘而漠視別人的傷心 是很不要得的
一條洗得薄薄的校服對你來說微不足道 加條底裙就可以了 但對某些人來 可能在心靈上留下很深的烙印 即使以后再富足 還是不能磨滅的烙印
別人的傷心事對你來說不算什麼 因為傷了的那心 是她的 不是你的

(大部分灰字说的是空姐的家事, 不是这篇文章的讨论范围)

我在BLOG里面说三道四是私人事, 难到这能算是公众事吗? 而根据塔所言, 遇到这种情况, 她是"不會在他blog留言說 你呀 這樣這樣是不對的 你呢 應該那樣那樣", 因为她觉得自己不是老几, 若要指导别人, "要看自己在對方心中是否有份量, 有資格去指導", 否则惹人笑话.

既然如此, 那么留了这一大片"指导性言论" 岂非自打嘴巴?

这就是我所提及到的思想上自我推翻.

讲到
吵架里面的一个观点不能用A的价值观念去衡量B(的价值观), 其实这是取自李天命提过的「极端相对主义」.

李博士所说的「极端相对主义」定义如下:


"「极端相对主义」认为: 「每个人都可以有他自己的价值判断, 价值判断是没有是非高下之分, 见仁见智, 我们不应该把自己的价值判断加诸别人身上.」"

李博士提出, 这有两处弊病:

"1. 实踐上此路不通
就我所见, 口头上认同极端相对主义的人, 都是口不对心的. 不久前,有个朋友问我怎么办, 他的女儿很不听话, 不论教她什么, 她都顶撞说: 「我就是喜欢, 怎么样? 」我的朋友就不知道怎么办了. 事实上如果极端相对主义者真的心口一致的话, 他就很难维护法治或者为法治辩护, 很难从事教育, 很难教小孩子了. 比如, 你教小孩子的时候对他说: 「用功读书吧, 不要这么懒, 不念好书, 长大了要做乞丐的.」小孩子就这样回应:「做乞丐好不好是一种价值判断, 价值判断是没有是非高下之分的, 见仁见智, 我就是喜欢做乞丐, 怎么样?」你就很难办了, 对吗? 又如果说: 「要有礼貌些, 吃东西时不要发出像猪吃飼料的声音.」他就回应说: 「猪吃飼料的声音好不好听, 是一种价值判断, 我就是喜欢这种声音! 怎么样?」要是你奉行极端相对主义, 你就不知道怎么教导他了. 由此可见, 所谓「价值判断是没有是非高下之分, 我们不应该把自己的价值判断加诸别人身上.」这种论调, 实际上是行不通的."

"2. 思想上自我推翻"
以上我已经用的留言作例子, 就不再赘.

人力车伕的故事


有位叫 Daniel 的 blogger 向我提出: "回想一下朱自清講人力車伕的故事......"

说实在, 朱自清的文章我只记得《背影》而已, 而讲人力车伕故事的, 我书架上倒有一本老舍的《駱駝祥子》. 顺手把它拿了出来重新细读了一遍.


駱駝祥子是一个从乡下出来的小伙子, 他自觉身骨子不错, 当上了人力车伕. 他一直梦想买一辆人力车, 所以每天到努力工作, 省吃省用, 一分一分的把钱存下来. 辛苦了一两年, 终于买到了梦寐以求的人力车, 想着好日子该快来了吧. 可惜不久他便给军队平白拉了去做苦工, 车丢了, 自己并了命才逃出来. 他从军队里面拉了几隻被丢弃的駱駝回来贱卖, 然后又一切又要重新开始. 他駱駝祥子的称呼, 就是这样来的.

后来駱駝祥子经历了人生的几个重大打击, 想着自己终究逃不过命运的作弄, 他彻底地放弃了自己. 駱駝祥子由当初一个勤劳/节俭/诚恳/不烟不酒不嫖不赌的人, 慢慢变成一个懒惰/挥霍/四处骗财/出卖朋友/嫖赌饮吹样样精的人.

老舍籍着駱駝祥子, 描写一般貪苦農民在半封建, 半殖民地的悲剧, 揭露了当时人民想以最大的代價和最低的條件求生存之不可能.

2009年1月24日 星期六

转载: 说错话


关于说错话

大家只是普通人,永遠無法掌握一件事的全部。所以,只能憑事情的局部去發表意見。

例如,根據我對聖經的理解,我認為教會應包容同性戀者。

如此陳述,既清晰表達自己意見,同時自處於一個較謙卑的位置,因為「我對聖經的理解」是有限的、可能充滿謬誤的。如果閣下有更佳的見解,提出來就是,尤其要發表有爭議性話題時,可以減輕backfire的力度。而且說話沒講得那麼「死」,往後仍然可以調整意見又保持誠實。

雖然黑人一直政冷感,貝理雅卸任時講的一句,卻印象深刻: I did what I thought was right for our country.

這句說話很高明,隱含了幾個意思1.) 我盡了力把事情做好 2.) 我的能力是有限的,也沒有水晶球 3.) 縱使盡力做正確的事,可能不夠好甚至是錯的

相對起大言不慚 I did the right thing,前者來得謙卑誠實。

日後發表批評或偉論,可借鏡貝理雅的修辭。

----------------------------------------------------------------------

我同意黑人所讲, 发表批评时, 可以找更好的修辭. 既可以表达好意思, 也更能让人接受.

毕竟我不是什么文膽出身, 要写出好像陈大文这样的文章, 需要有一定文学修养及知识, 写作技巧也需经过岁月的磨练. 在这方面, 我还是有许多要改进的空间.

而对于在空姐处的留言吵架里面我所讲过的话, 我只能说某些可能欠缺了润色, 使空姐本人或是拥护空姐的人, 难以接受. 如果我下笔前, 再花多点时间去注意遣词用字, 效果可能不一样.

此外, 我对于部分人士以匿名之便, 在留言区里面作口号式的叫嚷, 或者作出一些不合理的要求, 感觉到很无奈. 大家不能以事论事, 以理服人吗?

而对于在空姐处的留言这件事上面的价值判断, 我不认为有错, 论据已经讲得很清楚了, 就不再重复.

2009年1月23日 星期五

吵架


昨天的一篇在空姐处的留言让我与数位blog友吵架了.

或者吵架一词太强烈, 但我又想不起什么适当的词语去形容. 反正大家不同意对方的观点, 然后各自表术了自己的意见.

其中有一个观点是: 不能用A的价值观念去衡量B(的价值观).

这句不通哦, 这是自我推翻, 因为它本身就是一种价值观. 当我们要求别人不要用A的价值观去衡量B时, 我们恰恰就是要求别人接受这种价值判断.

每个人的成长背景不一样, 所以各自有一套价值观念存在, 看世事的时候, 是不可能撇开固有的价值观. 除非自己的价值观转变了, 或是随着年纪增长, 更能理解及体谅别人的价值观, 把辛辣的批评搁下, 多点包容.

对于一些事情, 在没有充分理解前因后果便马上作出批判, 或者透过批评别人来讲述自己的价值观, 都不是什么光彩的事情. 在这方面, 我承认我是有待改进的.

脚板

昨天去Nokia维修中心拿电话, 但脚板伤痕累累, 伤口处还有点肿了起来, 我翻箱倒柜左找右试, 也找不到勉强令我可以走得动的鞋子. 就在这兵慌马乱的时候, 父亲不忙在旁边搞 gag : 「平日看你好象很精明要强, 怎会做出这种蠢事? (指我撕走了脚上的皮)」虽然这个gag 烂得不可再烂, 但却逗得母亲陪他裂嘴而笑, 而我则一脸无奈.

结果, 我发现只有穿着这对一直在家穿的拖鞋, 才勉强可以行动.


我明白, 穿这对鞋由美乎去旺角实在是十级样衰. 平时也没有察觉它已经霉烂成这个模样. 但自作孽, 又有什么办法呢? 总好过赤脚吧!

去到Nokia 维修中心, 脚边的胶布还让这拖鞋给刮了下来, 黏着一点肉边条条 fing. 天啊!

2009年1月22日 星期四

在空姐处的留言

(设计图片)

空姐的原文:

媽媽:
在這個不可開電視、不可發出任何聲音、不可開燈的晚上,有點話想跟你說。
如今,除了工作需要,我已經不會回這個家的了,你有必要那樣對我嗎?
我不是朝九晚六的OL,也有freelance工作尚未完成,不可能晚上十一時就關燈關電腦睡覺的。
在這間屋內,連房間都沒有的我,如何生活呢?
睡在房中的你,以空氣流通為由,明明有四隻窗戶可開,偏不肯關上房門,要我關燈。
你說最近買股票蝕了錢,又說爸下年退休了,問我你倆日後的生活怎辦?
我怎知道呢?
你倆至少有買股票的閒錢和退休金,我甚麼都沒有。

其實,我是知道的。
你說過想要八千至一萬元家用。
每當你提及從前給了很多零用錢,讓我可以過較其他人豐裕的學校生活,如今合該在家用扣回時,都想坦白說清楚。
你給予的零用,只夠我乘搭巴士來回學校與家,還有canteen兩餐。
相對豐裕,只因為差不多一星期七天都有兼職。
還有,從小看到貧賤夫妻百事哀的實況,那時期,我不會找一個吃飯要AA制的男友。
說到這裡,如果你看到的話,一定又大罵我「等天收」。
是的,我在等天收,越快越好,最好在爸退休前收我回去。
我死了,你有了那份保險金,就不怕老來無依了。

你的女兒

------------------------------------------------------------------------
有些blog 客提议空姐搬出去住, 以后只用户口过家用给父母, 连见也不需要再见. 这件事情至于这个地步吗? 空姐也是偶然发泄一下, 何以要这样挑拨离间?

以下是我的留言 (有一些修订):


搬出去住支出更大, 把这些钱省下来给父母做家用更好啦.

其实阿妈要你关电脑, 早点睡, 是否为你健康着想呢? 我以前做审计的时候, 经常都带东西回家做到三四点, 就算父母先睡, 也是睡不安稳, 每隔一小时就会醒来, 看到我还未睡就会催我快点睡, 当时我会觉得他们很烦, 但心底里面知道他们是为我好.

至于你说父母期望你给予家用, 首先, 我觉得你与父母同住, 家中费用要负担一部分实在是无可厚非, 而且金额不算是很大 (HK$8K -HK$10K only). 就算你搬出去住, 自己租一间屋, 光是租金都要HK$7K-HK$8K吧, 还未计管理费/电/煤/水/NOW/cable/宽频/电话 etc.

你说小时候母亲给的零用钱只够搭车和吃两餐饭. 我不知道为什么求学时期早餐和晚餐会不在家吃而要出外吃. 如果因为做兼职而需要外出吃晚饭, 这不打紧哦, 你做兼职赚钱多过那餐饭钱就行了. 求学时期如果有空余时间, 去做兼职更能历练自己. 有些时下青年时间过多, 一有空就抽烟喝酒上disco界仔界女, 去深圳抽大麻索K吃白粉fing头3P4P5P, 高呼自己生活苦闷寂寞, 没有人了解自己. 做兼职总比做颓废青年强哦.

如果你只是偶然与朋友外出吃晚饭, 那么就算你不做兼职, 只把平时多出了的一餐 canteen 饭钱储起, 也应该够间中去些好点的餐厅了. 这又有何不够用之处? 起码比起同龄的我(我估计我们应该是差不多年龄的)富裕多了. 如果你要买参考书或者有其他必要用途, 需要额外金钱, 那时才向父母商量也行啊! 如果理由充分的话, 你父母也是会给你吧.

做学生应该是朴素些好, 现在的父母给子女过多的零用钱, 他们便花在买名牌书包/捧明星, 小学初中便把头发梳到鬼五马六, 眼影烟脂涂到一塌糊涂, 晚晚出去夜夜笙歌, 难道这又对子女好?


伸延阅读:
1. 養壞個仔要四球
2. 我死後必下地獄
3. 從freelance到連身裙到跑馬地
4. 衣

股票街

前两天改了喜帖街的词, 今天用手提电话录音, 有兴趣听的人请有心理准备, 我唱歌绝对会走音, 如果阁下冷伤风或者穿不够暖的话, 请不要按play 键或者先准备羽絨.



如果听不到全首歌的话, 试一下这条link 吧, 我也不知道为什么只有我自己可以听到全首, 而其他人不能.

股票街

---------------------------------------------------------------------



词: 小瓶子

忘掉過的
重新的出發 放棄汇丰
別再看塵封的股票 你正在要福街
築得起 人應該接受 都有日倒下
其實沒有一種安穩快樂 永遠也不差

就似這一區 曾經稱得上 美滿甲天下
但霎眼 全街的單位 快要住滿烏鴉
好景不會每日常在
恒子不可只往上爬
愛的 沒有一生一世嗎
大概不需要害怕

忘掉過的
當初的大行报告印着那位
派股息封信
及一切美麗舊年華 明日同步拆下

忘掉有過的
港交所汇丰雷曼中信泰富
溫馨的光境不過借出 到期拿回嗎
等不到下一代 是嗎

忘掉過的
回憶的笨象 刹那已倒下
面對這 墳起的荒土 你註定學會瀟灑
散户不會拒絕
大魔會唱好汇控
有感情 就會一生一世嗎
又再惋惜有用嗎

忘掉過的
當初的大行报告印着那位
派股息封信
及一切美麗舊年華 明日同步拆下

忘掉有過的
港交所汇丰雷曼中信泰富
溫馨的光境不過借出 到期拿回嗎
終須會時辰到 別怕
請放下手裡那股市 好嗎

完全虐待脚板手册


早两天试用在Scroll买的鞋垫, 穿了一对三寸高的高跟鞋懒有型地逛街, 脚枕位没错是舒服了些, 可是由于脚掌被垫高了, 脚指脚壁位空间少了, 所以全部都被磨到出水泡. 这不打紧, 我回家马上用针拮穿了那些水泡. 本来就这样用药水消毒, 然后黏上胶布就可以万事大吉. 可是我不知道是痴了那条根, 还是被鬼上身, 竟然手多多, 神推鬼撞下撕下了盖在伤口上的那层皮. 结果, 现在无论是穿什么鞋子, 反正一掂到伤口就痛到飞起.

2009年1月21日 星期三

点解Nokia 甘容易坏?



我部 Nokia 整完无耐, 又坏左, 今日部机突然自动熄了. 我再开机, 那些按钮完全无反应. 幸好这次我已经把 phone book 入了 sim card里面做backup.